Ted
Cruz, a Senator from Texas, is running for President of the United States.
However, he was born in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. His father was from Cuba but
his mother was born in Delaware. Cruz’s real name is Rafael Edward Cruz. Ted is
his nickname. His parents worked in the oil industry in Canada when he was born
in 1970.
The
question has been brought up lately about whether or not Cruz is a natural born
citizen by virtue of his mother being a natural born United States citizen.
Only a natural born citizen can be President of the United States.
Remember
this came up in 2009 when Barack Hussein Obama became President. Some said he
was born in Kenya, he said he was born in Hawaii and then there was the question
of whether or not he gave up his citizenship while living in Indonesia because
only those with citizenship in Indonesia could attend school. Those questioning
the birthplace of Obama were called “birthers”. Donald Trump was the leading
voice on this and it was finally settled when Obama finally released the full
version of his birth certificate a few years later.
The
best way to discover answers regarding this nation is to turn to the
Constitution. The Constitution spells out eligibility for President.
In
Article 2 section 1 it tells the requirements for being President:
Just
about every place you look up this topic you’ll see a little sentence that says
“The Constitution does not define the phrase “Natural born citizen.” The definition is in the wording. Let’s break
it down.
“No
person except a natural born Citizen…” That, in and of itself does not define
what a natural born citizen is So we’ll continue. “…or a Citizen of the United
States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to
the Office of President…” Now we have something to go on.
The
Constitution was adopted on September 13, 1788. George Washington was elected
President and his term began in 1789.
There
is another requirement which is that the President must have reached the age of
35 and been a resident for fourteen years of the United States to have been
elected.
The
Constitution does define what a natural born citizen is by virtue of the fact
that it states the difference between natural born citizen and a citizen. This is
backed up by saying “been fourteen years a resident within the United States.
By
this strict reading, Cruz would not be eligible to be President. If we separate
it by the semi colon in the printing, it says, “No person except a natural born
Citizen, or a Citizen of the United State, at the time of the Adoption of this
Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; “ Stop;
there. Cruz is not a natural born citizen, but he is a citizen of the United
States having renounced his Canadian citizenship in 2014 making him only a citizen
of the U.S. Since we’re nowhere near the
adoption of the Constitution, he couldn’t be eligible as a natural born citizen
at the time of the adoption. This disclaimer comes up in the second half.
The Second half then says “…neither shall any
person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the age of 35 Years
(Which Cruz does), and been fourteen years a resident of the United States”. Obviously,
he’s been a resident for fourteen years but that’s negated by the “adoption of
this Constitution”.
It doesn't say "in addition" it says "neither". The fourteen years is thought here to be because at the time of the adoption, many citizens were not born in America and the United States didn't exist until 12 years earlier. The oddity is that the first three Presidents were all born in the U.S. Washington in Virginia, Adams in Massachusetts and Jefferson in Virginia. That uses up the fourteen years.
Under
this reading, George Romney should not have been eligible and Ted Cruz would
not be eligible to hold the office of President of the United States. In
addition, John McCain technically wouldn’t be eligible except that the only
reason he was born out of the country was because they were with his father who
was out of the country at the time in service of this nation. But if we follow
the Constitution, there is no exception granted to that.
Please
note, I’m not a lawyer nor a Constitutional Scholar. I’m just interested.
You’re
welcome to comment.
Brett
No comments:
Post a Comment