Thursday, August 25, 2016

Bias, Mutiny and Democrats control Cities



Media Bias

We all know of the media bias that exists. CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, MSNBC, NY Times, Washington Post, etc. They will point out that Hillary goes after Trump for not making his tax returns available but they say nothing of Hillary’s transcripts in her speeches to Goldman Sachs and how she hasn’t made them public. Or when Hillary says that Trump does not have the temperament to be President using examples of how he treats a gold star family, but they don’t point out how the Secret Service agents were ducking into rooms to avoid Hillary if she were to walk down a hall that they happened to be in because of how she threatens and berates them at every opportunity.

In recent days Andrea Mitchell reported falsely that Donald Trump would be the oldest person to take the oath of office if he wins the election. Trump turned 70 in June. Hillary turns 69 in October. Oh what a difference a year makes. Oh, and by the way, Ronald Reagan took the oath of office at the age of 74 in 1985, just two weeks before turning 75.

Remember hurricane Katrina? They showed how President Bush had flown over Louisiana on his way back from his vacation at his home in Texas in 2005 and viewed the area from Air Force One. This week, Louisiana has had massive flooding and Donald Trump went there a couple of days after the flooding. President Obama is on vacation and is playing golf. Hillary Clinton is raising money for her campaign using the flooding but she hasn’t gone to the area.

At the RNC Convention the media talked about how mean and vicious the convention goers were for chanting “Lock her up”. But said nothing when Democrats at their convention said the same thing one night.

Recently, Malia Obama, the Presidents daughter was caught on video smoking pot and just the other day apparently was taken away from a party on Martha’s Vineyard just before police moved in and arrested everyone. The press barely mentioned it. But when former President Bush’s daughters were out drinking it was a major news story for days and they were always under scrutiny by the press long after the incident.

GOP Mutiny

At the beginning of the Primary season, at the first debate, the candidates were asked by Fox’s Bret Baier if there is anyone that would not sign a pledge to support the eventual nominee. The only one to raise his hand was Trump. He came around a few weeks later and said he would support whomever the eventual winner was. So all had pledged to support the nominee.  When Trump won the nomination several didn’t. Christie, Huckabee, Carson, Walker, Perry, all have backed Trump and been out front about it. Graham, Santorum, Firorina, Bush and Cruz have not. Cruz even got booed off stage at the convention for refusing to back Trump.

Now several dozen former Republicans including one former Congressman, Chris Shays from Connecticut, have sent a letter asking the RNC to stop funding Trump and put the money towards Congressional seats, with Shays actually coming out and endorsing Hillary.

Those Republicans is one of the reasons that Trump won the nomination. They are establishment Republicans who go along to get along. This is what the people of this country do not want.

Voting for Hillary is not just a one election event. Electing Hillary will set the Supreme Court on a course to liberal rulings that are not constitutional and will be set for a generation at least. It will cause taxes to increase and continue the 8 year malaise on our economy. It will cause the borders to be open to anyone that wants to come here regardless of our laws, not to mention our safety when terrorists come in through those borders.

Many are talking about voting for the Libertarian ticket of Johnson/Weld. This is a vote for Hillary as well. The next President is going to be either Republican or Democrat. It is not going to be anyone else.

What’s wrong with America’s big cities?

All of the following cities have been run by Democrats for a long time. Listed is the city and the last time a Republican was in charge and his name:

Atlanta- 1877- Nedom Angier
Baltimore-1967- Theodore McKeldin
Chicago- 1931- William Hale Thompson
Cleveland- 1989 – George Voinovich
Detroit-1962- Louis Miriani
Milwaukee-1908- Sherburn M. Becker
Philadelphia-1952-Bernard Samuel

You're welcome to comment. 


Brett








Thursday, July 21, 2016

Cruz Shows Why He's not Fit to be President




Senator Ted Cruz of Texas, a Republican. A candidate who finished with 1,000 less delegates than Donald Trump, just proved why he was not the man to be the nominee of the Republican party.

Cruz, the son of a Cuban immigrant who is also a Pastor could not bring himself to back the Republican nominee for President, thus stealing the spotlight from Governor Mike Pence, Trumps VP choice.

After talking about forgiveness, freedom, and limited government he refused to say anything more than “vote your conscience”. Senator Cruz proved exactly why he was not Presidential material.

Fortunately for Ted Cruz, he was followed by Newt Gingrich who countered Cruz’s comments and paraphrased the meaning of them. Newt Gingrich said, “I think you misunderstood one paragraph of what Ted Cruz said. Ted Cruz said vote your conscience for anyone that will uphold the constitution.” Newt said, “there is only one candidate that will uphold the Constitution. So to paraphrase Ted Cruz,  if you want to protect the Constitution of the United States, the only possible candidate this fall is the Trump/Pence Republican Ticket!”

Most did not see this because the networks all went to their talking heads rather than show Gingrich’s speech. I urge you to look it up on You Tube. There is another that the networks didn’t cover that was really good, but there was a part that called on the press to do their jobs, so naturally the networks wouldn’t play that. Laura Ingraham gave the best speech up to that point just before Cruz. She admonished the other Republican candidates to honor their pledge to support the Republican ticket.  You can watch that here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sqNhDVcvrsg

Ted Cruz could have made the Republican Convention worse had it not been for Ingraham before him and Gingrich after him. When the booing started and it was clear that the people wanted him to endorse Trump, he chose to ignore them. Cruz would have come off much better had he endorsed, as he promised in writing, but he chose to think of himself rather than the country. He was in direct contrast to the theme of the convention. Country. All he had to do when he saw the reaction from the people, was to adjust his speech. We all know it can be done. Gingrich did it to cover Cruz’s backside. Cruz certainly could have adlibbed to take the higher ground, but he chose the low rode.

If he has future aspirations in the Republican party, he probably just quashed them tonight.

You’re welcome to comment.




Brett

Wednesday, June 8, 2016

GOP Should Get Behind the Nominee



The GOP leadership is out of touch with American people. There were 17 candidates for President last August. Four of them were considered anti-establishment. Donald Trump a businessman. Ben Carson, a doctor. Carly Fiorina, a businesswoman and Senator Ted Cruz, a politician that constantly bucked the system in his few years in the Senate.

Fiorina did very well in the debates, but you didn’t see much else of her outside of the debates. She was the first of the four to leave. Ben Carson, a soft spoken doctor, did well and wouldn’t knuckle under to the press, was the second to leave when he began dropping in the polls. Ted Cruz, the rookie Senator from Texas did well by avoiding arguments with Trump, and is very good at explaining the Constitution, dropped out after Indiana when the results didn’t match his statements of how well he was doing.

That left Trump the businessman that led in the polls from the day he entered the race a year ago. He said the things that Americans are concerned about. Illegal Immigration and building the wall. Political Correctness. The trade deficit. The Iranian deal. People not working.

Trump is a businessman and not a politician. He talks about how the politicians say one thing but once in office, they do another. He’s not speaking like a politician and that’s what people are apparently longing for.

When he talked about the Mexicans sending their rapists and murderers, he was talking about the trains loaded with people on top of the trains coming here. The people walking from Central America across deserts and how the drug cartels were taking advantage of the mass influx of illegal immigrants coming to the United States, and being put into the slave trade, and killing and raping people as they came here. These were all reported in 2014.

Trump is involved in a lawsuit over his University. The judge in the case is of Mexican descent. He has been a member of LaRaza, supposedly a group that advocates for Latino’s to come across the border illegally and get a pathway to citizenship. It’s true the judge was born in Indiana and is an American citizen and it’s apparently true that he was a huge force in the fight against the drug cartels. But one good deed doesn’t give you a pass on bad deeds. Having said that, it does not mean that the judge has committed a bad deed. In fact, there is some evidence that he’s helped Trump by delaying the trial until after the election to try to prevent bias.

However, is Trump wrong to be concerned that this judge may have a grudge against Trump because of Trumps position on illegal aliens? If Trump thinks there have been some bad decisions from this judge recently, then it’s reasonable to have concerns that the judge may be biased. It doesn’t mean he is, but there is a reason for concern.

Since Trump brought up that the judge is of Mexican descent, the politically correct politicians who are only worried about their own re-elections decided to play the racism card.
Donald Trump is the presumptive nominee. These so-called skilled politicians could find a way to answer for Trump. If it turns out that Trump is a racist, it will come out and he’ll be toast in this election. But it’s the responsibility of the GOP to give their nominee the benefit of the doubt. After all, Trump is so popular because of the failures of the leadership in the GOP over the past 6 years.

Mitch McConnell, Senate Majority Leader, has walked away from taking on Obama and his failed policies. He doesn’t stand up to Obama. Speaker Paul Ryan took over the speakership of the House and instead of putting out a budget that reflects the will of the people, he pushed through Obama’s budget including funding health care.

The GOP leaders and members are what created Donald Trump  Presidential Candidate. Trump is not the most articulate person politically so the GOP needs to help and not hurt. Or do they really want Hillary and Bill Clinton back in the White House?

Senator Lindsey Graham, Senator Mark Kirk, Senator Ted Cruz, former Governor Jeb Bush, and others should sit down and shut up. You can help, or follow but if you’re not going to help defeat Hillary Clinton, then get out of the way or you’ll be run over by the Trump candidacy or eaten up by the Clinton machine.

I for one, do not want the children of this country to get another sex education from Bill or Hillary Clinton.

You’re welcome to comment.



Brett

Friday, May 13, 2016

Founding Fathers Predicted the End



Our Founding Fathers were amazing men that did amazing things and then created amazing documents. Documents that were appropriate for the times and yet had the forethought to apply them to the future. The Declaration of Independence, the first ever of it’s kind. It not only outlined the intent of the present in 1776 but it also gave a roadmap to the future in the event the new government ever began to run amok with its admonition of tyranny.

The Constitution with its bill of rights. For instance, the second amendment with the right to bear arms. The right to bear arms wasn’t for hunters or sport. It was put in place to give the people the right to rise up against despotism. They also took into consideration that they may not have covered everything that could conceivably arise and put in place a way to amend the Constitution in case of forgotten freedoms for the people and restrictions on the government in the future. They understood that the Word of God is the only infallible writing. The Constitution provided avenues to amend what they may not have considered.

Those same founding fathers also warned and even predicted the fall of the United States of America. Here’s some examples:

 On the occasion of the last day of the Constitutional Convention in 1787, Benjamin Franklin said, “I agree to this Constitution … and I believe, further, that this is likely to be well administered for a course of years, and can only end in despotism, as other forms have done before it, when the people shall become so corrupted as to need despotic government, being incapable of any other.”

In less than two months, our nation will be 240 years old. We are falling into exactly what Franklin was talking about, as you’ll see from other quotes and compare to today’s events.

Our government is corrupt. Just look at recent history. An impeached President, albeit not convicted in the Senate. Numerous leaders involved in scandals from not paying their taxes while running the financial system, being convicted for sex crimes against children but not until long after they are out of government, collecting money illegally from donors and hiding it, etc. The list of convicted former leaders and even some current ones is getting longer by the minute.

The people are also allowing the corruption when they elect convicted felons such as those convicted of taking a life and installing them into government.

George Washington gave a concern as well that we see in recent years when he said in his farewell address in 1796, “If, in the opinion of the people, the distribution or modification of the constitutional powers be in any particular wrong, let it be corrected by an amendment in the way which the Constitution designates. But let there be no change by usurpations; for though this, in one instance, may be the instrument of good, it is the customary weapon by which free governments are destroyed.”


How many times have we heard that the Constitution is a living document? This is a way of saying that we can interpret the Constitution to what we want rather than what it actually says,. We even see that in people’s speech to each other on a personal level these days when it’s said there is your truth and there is my truth instead of calling them opinions. As said earlier, only God’s Word is always true. We are men and women and make mistakes.

We are now seeing the Constitution being manipulated. Health care payments to insurance companies to subsidize those that can’t afford the cost of the insurance is now being paid for by the government, but the Congress, who hold the purse strings for the nation, is the only body that can determine where monies are to be applied. Other aspects of the Constitution are being ignored such as enforcing the laws to protect our borders for the sake of getting more votes.

Thomas Jefferson warned of the Judicial Branch taking more power than is intended under the Constitution in 1821. “The great object of my fear is the federal judiciary. That body, like gravity, ever acting with noiseless foot and unalarming advance, gaining ground step by step and holding what it gains, is engulfing insidiously the governments into the jaws of that which feeds them.”

The courts have taken to writing laws rather than interpreting them in recent years. We have three branches of government. Executive, Legislative and Judicial. The legislative writes the laws, the executive signs them into law and the judicial interprets the law and whether or not it is legal. When the judicial re-writes a law, they have overstepped their bounds and when they create a law, they have overstepped. That in effect exerts more power over the people which they don’t have constitutionally.

In 1792, James Madison said, “If Congress can employ money indefinitely, for the general welfare, and are the sole and supreme judges of the general welfare, they may take the care of religion into their own hands; they may appoint teachers in every state, county, and parish, and pay them out of the public treasury; they may take into their own hands the education of children, the establishing in like manner schools throughout the union; they may assume the provision of the poor…. Were the power of Congress to be established in the latitude contended for, it would subvert the very foundations, and transmute the very nature of the limited government established by the people of America.”

He was talking about a bill to subsidize the cod fishing industry. Welfare. Giving money  from the government prop up those that refuse to do for themselves and then warning that the government could take over education, away from the parents and in the hands of the government. Even just today, the government sent out a letter to all school districts telling them to allow bathrooms to be used by anyone that identifies themselves as another gender even though biologically they are not of that gender. If the schools refuse, they will lose federal funding. The government, withholding the peoples money from the people if they don’t comply with something that has not been written into law but rather mandated by the government. Even if you agree with their position, they are abusing their power by dictating this policy.

Madison was right. This is not limiting government, this is limiting the people from their own decisions regarding their own lives. Government intrusion.

In 1838 Abraham Lincoln said in a speech, “There is even now something of ill omen among us. I mean that increasing disregard for law which pervades the country — the growing disposition to substitute the wild and furious passion in lieu of the sober judgment of courts, and the worse than savage mobs for the executive ministers of justice. The disposition is awfully fearful in any community; and that it now exists in ours … it would be a violation of truth to deny.”

A court of law said that Michael Brown was responsible for his own death due to his actions and that the deputy involved that did the shooting was acting in self defense. The court decision, was not respected. The evidence was not respected. Instead, a segment of the population took to the streets and burned their neighborhood for several days.

In 1780, John Adams wrote, “There is nothing which I dread so much as a division of the republic into two great parties, each arranged under its leader, and concerting measures in opposition to each other. This, in my humble apprehension, is to be dreaded as the greatest political evil under our Constitution. Nothing which I dread so much.”

What do we have today? Two parties that talk about loyalty to the party first and the nation second. The primaries are not about the people’s vote in some states, and the delegations are not all decided by the vote, but rather by the party leaders. The party has replaced the nation as a priority.

George Washington also said the same sorts of things about the two party system in 1790, “The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge, natural to party dissension, which in different ages and countries has perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism. But this leads at length to a more formal and permanent despotism. The disorders and miseries, which result, gradually incline the minds of men to seek security and repose in the absolute power of an individual; and sooner or later the chief of some prevailing faction, more able or more fortunate than his competitors, turns this disposition to the purposes of his own elevation, on the ruins of Public Liberty.”

Abraham Lincoln seemed to give a prediction on how America will come to it’s demise. “Shall we expect some transatlantic military giant, to step over the ocean, and crush us at a blow? Never! — All the armies of Europe, Asia and Africa combined, with all the treasure of the earth (our own excepted) in their military chest; with a Bonaparte for a commander, could not by force, take a drink from the Ohio, or make a track on the Blue Ridge, in a trial of a Thousand years. At what point, then, is the approach of danger to be expected?”

We are being ripped apart from within but, and this may be splitting hairs, we are also being ripped apart not from within. This government has opened the borders with virtually no safety controls at all. So they are allowing the outside in where we can be destroyed.

But is this the time that America comes to an end or even an end to the ways as we know it but the essentials still there just being used inappropriately? I choose to believe that there is still hope.

In 2009, the people rose up when President Obama went overboard with his stimulus package and they created the Tea Party. It wasn’t perfect, but it was the people at first that started it. Some of it became corrupted when some opportunistic politicians jumped in and tried to steer it, but it’s had some success despite that.

When one party forced Obamacare on the people, the people began to fight back, unfortunately, they could only go to the existing government leaders and they have been feckless. Slowly but surely those leaders are losing power as we see in this election process. The “outsiders” have pretty much led the story in this election while the establishment has tried to claim they are outsiders.

I have no idea what sort of a President Donald Trump will make. I don’t know if he’s conservative, moderate, or even if he’s pulling a fast one over the people, but one thing we do know is what we’ll get from a President Hillary. With her, we’ll continue to glide down the path of destruction for this country.

We have learned that some that wanted to be the “outsider” and claimed to be “conservative” cannot honor their word. In the first debate, a question was posed mainly for Donald Trump about backing the eventual nominee and not running a third party. They all agreed to back the nominee. So far, several have not honored their word. Jeb Bush, Lindsay Graham, and even those that didn’t run this time, like Mitt Romney have said they will not back the Republican. It’s most disappointing to me that the entire Bush family is not backing the Republican nominee. That makes it about their power and not about their nation. They seem to prefer Hillary and the destructive path she’ll have us on in months than to honor the wishes of the people and their own word.

The best way to save this nation is to trust the people and not the politicians. The people need to hold the politicians feet to the fire, and if they don’t act as their constituents require, that they be told, “you’re fired”, and put someone in that will represent the people.

You’re welcome to comment.


Brett

Friday, May 6, 2016

Save our Dying Nation




Benjamin Franklin once said, “When the people find that they can vote themselves money that will herald the end of the republic.”

We all know that this country is $19 Trillion in debt. What most don’t realize is that there is another $221 Trillion of debt on top of that.

Our government is getting so bloated that we’re in danger of losing this country as we know it. That’s not an accurate statement. Our government “is” so bloated. We have people that have been legitimately in need of assistance. The elderly, and the disabled are the ones that come to mind first. These people have needs that they must have help. Unfortunately, we have started giving money to those that aren’t in need but refuse to do for themselves.

We have heard throughout our lives that only in the United States of America can a person start with nothing and build a life. It’s been proven throughout our history. It doesn’t matter the age of the person. A young person can do it. An older person can do it. Anyone can do it! But it’s never done by government mandate.

We have become an entitlement society. If you don’t get a job, there’s a government agency that will give you money. If you are a certain race, there’s an agency that will give you money. If you’re here legally or illegally, there’s a government agency that will give you money.

This has been passed on in our personal lives as well. Driving is not a privilege to kids. It’s now a “right”. Health care is not something you go and earn money to pay for, it’s now a “right” and if you can’t pay for it, there’s a government agency that will pay for it. Now even kids have cell phones and that is their “right”. Not on social media? Why not? Your neighbor is, it’s your “right”.

We have rights spelled out in our constitution. The Bill of Rights. Those are “rights”! There was some other “rights” spelled out in the declaration of independence. “The Right to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.”

Cars, cell phones, social media would fall under the category of “pursuit of happiness”. You’re not guaranteed happiness, you’re guaranteed the “PURSUIT” of happiness.

Our government has removed the importance of charity and replaced it with entitlement. Abortions are not a right, but the government will pay or help pay for it. This removes the option for those that don’t believe in abortion and uses some of their dollars to pay for something that they wouldn’t contribute to.

Welfare is part of that $221 Trillion dollars we’re spending. There is a limit. It’s assumed by most economists that when our debt hits $24 Trillion it will exceed our ability to pay. People that have a legitimate need, such as the elderly and the disabled, will not get that needed money.

Those that are sitting around collecting welfare will not receive money any longer. Children whose parents refuse to provide for them, will no longer have money to buy food. Not from government and not from charities. This will expand down to those that are working and making a living for themselves. So if you like to give to a charity or help someone in need, you’ll no longer be able to because you’ll no longer have that money. Those of us that are responsible, go to work everyday, bring home a paycheck and take care of our families will have our own children/grandchildren starving and homeless. People will actually be starving! Crime will increase. Not due to laziness or inability. But due to entitlements. Worried about your facebook account and whether or not you can check it today? Imagine wondering where your next meal will come from or where you’ll find shelter.

That comfortable home you’re living in, whether a mansion, or a 1,500 square foot home with a garage and a basement will be lost because there is no money. Essential services such as police and fire, will no longer be affordable. Utilities, such as electricity, gas, sewer will no longer be affordable. Right now, people think it’s a big deal when their power goes out for a day or two and they can’t shower. Imagine what it will be like when there is no power at all because you don’t have a place to live let alone the money to pay an electric bill.

There’s an old saying that if you give a man a fish, you’ve fed him for a day, but teach him to fish and you’ve fed him for life. No, it’s not biblical but it’s common sense. We’ve been giving everyone everything if they have one thing in their lives that has not gone quite the way someone thinks it should. We are coming to a place where we won’t have anything for them any longer.

We still have time. We can still correct it. But, it’s going to take some guts. Those we elect need to cut the spending. They need to eliminate the ridiculous regulations that hold people back from working and making a living. We’re in serious trouble and we actually have politicians fighting about whether men who choose to identify themselves as a woman can use a ladies restroom. Do you want some common sense?

A bathroom is used to expel the waste in your body. It’s not supposed to be a social experiment! If you have a male part, use the men’s room. If we waste our time on issues like this, we’re avoiding saving this  nation from spending itself into oblivion.

If you want your government to keep spending your money unwisely, then prepare yourselves to look at things you can’t stand looking at. Like a  child digging through a dumpster looking for lunch. Or another child beating yet another child to death for something he or she is wearing. When Barack Obama took office, our debt was just over $10 Trillion. Now it’s $19 Trillion and will be over $20 Trillion before the next president takes over.

If you don’t believe me that these things can and will happen, watch what happens on the southern border as another few hundred thousand kids come on top of railroad cars and walking across deserts to this country only to be raped, murdered or sold into human bondage as happened in the summer of 2014. The picture at the top shows illegal immigrants coming here in 2014. How long before this is a way of life for our own citizens and children? 

If we don’t start holding our governments feet to the fire this is exactly what we’re headed for. Face it and fix it, or run and hide from it until it catches up with us and you can no longer hide from it. We found we can vote ourselves money and our politicians have done just that. Now it’s time to see that we can vote ourselves away from these entitlements and get back on a track where we can save this country and hope that it’s not too late. I for one do not want to see friends, their children, grandchildren, nor my own children and eventually grandchildren starving. I don’t want to see one parent looking at their ten year old that in days past could be playing little league baseball but now can’t figure out how to stay warm in the winter snow.

You’re welcome to comment.


Brett


Tuesday, April 19, 2016

Selection of Delegates is a Scam!



The primaries and caucuses of the various states has been a mess. But it’s never really mattered until this year. In years past, a primary or caucus would be held and people would go and cast their vote thinking that they were voting for President. Since the last contested convention in the Republican Party was 40 years ago in 1976, it’s really not been thought much about.

However, politics hasn’t been thought much about either. For years, we’d go and we’d vote and whomever won, won. We’d choose again the next election. Something changed though. It is my contention that Ronald Reagan was the beginning of this change. Coming out of the Carter years we had double digit unemployment, double digit inflation and double digit interest rates. The country was a mess. The term malaise was used more frequently and even began to be measured.

Reagan came to the campaign with a defined meaning for Conservative. He made America patriotic again. While in the beginning people would sneer at his standing up and leading the singing for America the Beautiful, or pledging allegiance, to the people it was refreshing and believed. Then he made good on his prosperity pledge. He lowered the upper tax rate from 70%  to 28%. He did not jump into war as was predicted. He taught the country “peace through strength”. In short, he did what he said he was going to do. Turn the people loose to make lives for themselves with as little hindrance from the government as he could possibly cajole out of the Democrats in Congress.

Reagan’s policies and deals with the Democrat Congress brought this country out of the deepest recession since the depression. It was swift, it was forceful, as if someone had reached their hand into a swimming pool and yanked a man out before he could drown. The economy grew and we were out of the recession in short order. Even his wife, Nancy, created a policy that saved lives. A young girl asked Mrs. Reagan what she should do when a group of her friends were pressuring her to join them in using drugs. Mrs. Reagan looked at her and said “Just say No!”. So simple, but very effective.

Reagan was rewarded with a second term and won it in a landslide winning 49 out of 50 states. His Vice President, George H. W. Bush,  was also rewarded at the end of Reagan’s second term with his own election victory over Michael Dukakis.

This is where I believe that the people of this country began to pay more attention. As the country was sliding into another recession, the first since 1981 that Reagan dragged us out of, Bush, who said in his campaign, “read my lips, no new taxes” then raised taxes pushing the recession a bit deeper. It was small, but it was noticeable. This brought on Bill Clinton. The scandals. The lies. The problems. Due to Clinton’s first two years, the Republicans behind Newt Gingrich created the Contract with America invoking Reagans name and policies and they ended up taking control of the House in 1995. Due to that election we had a balanced budget a few years later. The people were more involved.

The attacks on September 11, 2001 brought the people closer to what their government was doing to protect us. Then in 2008, Barrack Hussein Obama was elected. Two days after Presidents day, barely a month after his election, he signed the stimulus bill, passed by the Congress by nearly all Democrats and only one Republican. This caused the creation of the Tea Party.

In 2010, the Republicans took control of the House, but not before Obama got his socialized health care plan through the Congress, after some shenanigans by Democrats, and without even one Republican vote. Then the Senate went Republican and despite a government shut down, the Republicans added to their majority in record numbers in the House and now had the Senate, although not a filibuster proof majority.

The Republicans did not do as they said in defunding planned parenthood and obamacare which brings us to this election. This brings us to this election. The people did not want another career politician. We’ve had it with career politicians. So the bright spots in this election were among the 17 Republican candidates. Donald Trump, a businessman, Ben Carson a retired surgeon. Carly Fiorina, a businesswoman but also with experience in government both here and abroad, and Ted Cruz, a politician who has bucked the establishment politicians from within the Senate.

The field was whittled down to two. There is a third who has no mathematical chance. Donald Trump and Ted Cruz.

So now we get to the primaries and caucuses. To be honest, I thought, as I think most Americans did, that you vote in your caucus or primary and you’re allotted delegates based on the number of votes you get in each state. Not so fast. Each state has their own rules and the way they operate.

In Michigan for example. To get any delegates you must first get at least 15% of the vote. If you don’t, you get zero delegates. If you get 14.99% of the vote, you come away with nothing. All that finish with 15% or more of the vote get the number of delegates based on your percentage of the vote in Michigan.

So the results in Michigan were Donald Trump 42.644% of the vote got him 25 delegates. Cruz got 29.048% or 17 delegates and Kasich 28.308% or 17 delegates.

Had anyone gotten 50% of the vote, they’d have gotten all of the delegates regardless of what the others received. These delegates are bound to their candidates through the first vote at the convention. If a candidate drops out or suspends his campaign, those delegates are free to go where they choose. Nobody can claim them, and their candidate cannot dictate to them where they must vote once they’ve dropped out.

Contrast Michigans primary with Colorado and Wyoming. They do not have an election in Colorado or Wyoming for President in those states. They have caucuses to select delegates. Those delegates are not tied to any Presidential Candidate. So when their caucus comes up for selecting a President, it’s not the people voting for the President. It’s the delegates. You may say that the people chose the delegates in their election, and you’d be right. But they chose without knowing how that delegate would vote for President.

Pennsylvania is different still. They have 71 delegates up for vote. Only 17 are committed to a particular candidate and they are only bound to that candidate for the first vote at the convention. 54 delegates are at large. They are not bound to anyone.

Can you believe that all of the states have different rules? When the people are left out of the voting for their own representation, is it any wonder that the people are upset at what’s happening in the political arena this year?

So what happens at the convention? If a candidate doesn’t reach 1,237 delegates from the primaries and caucuses, the convention holds a vote. If nobody gets the 1,237, they vote again. And again. And they keep voting until they get their number. However, the delegates are only committed (based on the states rules) for the first ballot. The second ballot and beyond they may choose as they wish.

What could entice them to choose a different candidate? Perhaps they didn’t want to choose the guy they were forced to choose but once it gets to the second ballot, it doesn’t matter any longer, they can now choose as they see fit.

Candidates can come in and give them all sorts of gifts. Hotel rooms, dinners, baseball tickets, money, etc. This is in effect buying the election.

Donald Trump is right. The system is corrupt. Maybe it should be more uniform similar to the electoral college for the general election. At least then the people get a say.

You’re welcome to comment.

Brett




Wednesday, March 23, 2016

Cruz and Trump Creating President Hillary


With the way this campaign is going and the most recent turn of events, it’s looking more and more likely that we’ll see a President Hillary.

Here’s what seems to have happened. In Utah, a superpac put out an ad for Senator Ted Cruz. Utah is a very religious state. It is the home of the Mormons. It’s considered one of the most prominent states when it comes to religious beliefs and it’s solidly Republican.

Leading up to the Primary vote in Utah yesterday, an ad was put out by a Super Pac for Senator Ted Cruz. That ad showed a photo of Donald Trump’s wife, Melania,  posing for GQ magazine fifteen years ago. She was not married to Trump at the time. She was undressed and provocatively positioned. This is naturally designed for the voters of Utah so they’d choose Senator Cruz in the primary, which he won with 69% of the vote.

Today, Donald Trump, upon hearing of this ad, tweeted out threatening to “spill the beans” on Heidi Cruz, wife of Ted Cruz.  

There are two types of people in this world that I consider despicable. They are wasting oxygen as far as I’m concerned. Those people are those that would abuse children and those that would abuse women. If you’re going to exert power over a child or a woman just because you can, you deserve to be shunned. Banned from society. You’re a worthless being and I purposely left out “human” before being.

Before you get the idea that I’m going to defend one of these candidates over the other, you’re wrong. Both of them, Trump and Cruz, are dead wrong and severely lacking in character in this drama.

Once that ad came out, Ted Cruz should have 
grabbed every microphone and camera he could get his hands on and denounced the ad and demanded that the ad be pulled, destroyed and never again shown with the Super Pac issuing a profound apology. He should have harped on them until they did as he required! But he didn’t.

Now, I understand that candidates are not supposed to be in contact with the Super Pac’s. The name of the Super Pac is “Make America Awesome”. It’s a violation of the law for them to have any control over Super Pac’s. If Cruz standing up and demanding that they pull that ad and hammering home that message until it’s pulled, is against the law, then he should have violated the law and paid the fine. To do anything less than to stand up for what’s right is the same as giving your okay for this ad. YOU DO NOT ATTACK WOMEN!! It was done in Cruz’s name and he should have stood up against that ad because it was done for his benefit. To do anything less makes him just as guilty of attacking a woman as the Super Pac.

Donald Trump did try to defend his wife, but the way he chose to do it was just as wrong as Cruz. He threatened to attack Cruz’s wife Heidi. If abusing a woman is wrong, isn’t abusing a woman in retaliation just as wrong?

These women are not the candidates. They are the wives of the candidates. They may be campaigning with them but they are not the candidate. They are their wives.

In 1824, Andrew Jackson ran against John Quincy Adams for the Presidency. He lost. He ran again in 1828. The first time was a hard fought battle. The second was worse. Jackson’s wife was short and fat. Jackson was older for that time in history. Life expectancy was less than his age at the time. He was losing his teeth. He had a rough past.

When he met his wife he fell in love. They got married. His wife had been married before to an abusive husband. It wasn’t like today where you can get a divorce at the drop of a hat. She tried to get a divorce and her husband wouldn’t give it to her. Finally she left him for the last time and he filed for divorce. She met and married Andrew Jackson thinking she was divorced but her first husband had failed to finalize the divorce. When this was discovered, she had the divorce finalized and then remarried Jackson in 1794.

In 1806 a man named Charles Dickinson claimed that Jackson had reneged on a bet and then called Jackson’s wife, Rachel, a bigamist. Jackson challenge him to a duel for his wife’s honor. Jackson was shot in the chest but still managed to shoot and kill his opponent. For his wife’s honor! Jackson had problems the rest of his life from that gunshot wound, but he survived.

During the election of 1828, Rachel campaigned with and for her husband. Adams and his people brought up the bigamy and used it in the campaign calling Rachel a bigamist.  It was grueling and when the election was finally won, Rachel had a heart attack and died. Jackson was distraught and held on to his wife after she died. He had to be pulled away from her.

She was buried on Christmas eve and at the burial Jackson said, “May God Almighty forgive her murders. I never can.”

Jackson didn’t stop there. You can read about the Petticoat affair and find another example of his standing up for a woman’s honor. This time a member of his cabinet’s wife.

During the Clinton years, the nation was told to leave Chelsea Clinton out of any stories. She was not to be attacked. Hillary was involved and put in charge of the travel office, and of course health care both of which were debacles. She’s now close to being indicted for her actions with the E-mail and possibly for her actions as Secretary of State and using that position to raise money for the Clinton Foundation. Those are possibly illegal acts that she committed. She’s to be held accountable.

But what has Melania Trump done? Posed for a picture fifteen years ago before she even knew Trump? What has Heidi Cruz done other than marry Ted Cruz?

To go after these women, either yourself or using surrogates is just plan despicable.
We are in danger of losing our country and our freedoms and our way of life in this election. Yet we have three candidates on the Republican side that are acting like anything but a decent human being. They are almost making Hillary Clinton look like a normal person and we all know that she’s nowhere near being anything a President should be.

We have terrorists attacking around the world including in this country with the promise of more. We have a southern border where any terrorist or even criminal can walk across the border like it was hopping a hopscotch line. Do you really think Hillary will have a strategy to combat ISIS? Her plan is to have them as happy immigrants that vote for Democrats!  We have a health care system that is already creating joblessness and poverty. We have veterans that served this country to protect us and keep us free being treated worse than dogs in a kennel by our Veterans Administration. We have a Democrat party that is using race baiting to drum up votes at the expense of not just the white Americans but the black Americans and Hispanic Americans as well. And these two clowns, Cruz and Trump are attacking each others wives?

Ronald Reagan created an 11th commandment. That commandment is “Thou shalt not speak ill of a fellow Republican.”  Are we really so bad off that we need a twelfth commandment to keep the men from attacking women?

Let me be clear if I haven’t already been. If you’re abusing your wife, you’re worthless. If you’re abusing women, you’re worthless. If you’re abusing another’s wife, you’re worthless. If you don’t stand up for a woman when she’s being attacked, you’re a coward! That’s not presidential material and that will only get Hillary elected President. If you like being dictated to by the government, then you’re on the right track because if Hillary wins, that’s exactly what will happen.

You’re welcome to comment.


Brett



Tuesday, March 22, 2016

GOP: Grabbing Defeat from the jaws of Victory

The GOP seems to be doing all it can to grab defeat from the jaws of victory! This election should have been nearly a cakewalk for the Republicans this year. Out of 17 candidates to begin with, they had several conservatives. This is important because moderates don’t win.

In 2012, Mitt Romney lost to Obama. Romney is not and was not a conservative. Granted, next to Obama, he could appear conservative but look at his record. He’s not.

In 2008, John McCain lost to Obama. McCain is not a conservative. In fact, just a year or two before he was considering changing over to the Democrat party. George Bush was conservative and won twice. Granted, his competition wasn’t all that great in Kerry (2004) and Gore (2000) although he barely beat Gore. In 1996, the GOP ran Bob Dole, not a conservative. In 1992, Bush the elder was trying to get re-elected but we found he wasn’t conservative. Remember the “no new taxes” pledge that he broke? That brought on a short recession. So we got Clinton instead.

This year, the GOP had several Conservatives. My favorite, Carly Fiorina, largely ignored during the debates while the so-called big boys duked it out. Dr. Ben Carson, who started falling after Senator Cruz said he was dropping out of the race in Iowa. We’ll never know now how close he could have been in Iowa and then what would have happened later.

Governor Mike Huckabee. Conservative but probably too nice and not in the fray the news media preferred. Rick Santorum, never really got off the ground.

Governor John Kasich. Great with the budget, but not conservative when it comes to amnesty, border protection and health care.

Look at the other side, however. Bernie Sanders, an admitted Socialist and Hillary Clinton, probably a criminal but not yet indicted. Sanders is only running as a Democrat because he knew he’d never get the coverage as an independent. Clinton should be a piece of cake to beat and she’s done nothing to improve her situation. She has no accomplishments as a Senator and none as Secretary of State.

We’re now left with three standing and only two that have a chance to win. Kasich is still in but has no mathematical chance of winning enough delegates. Senator Ted Cruz is in second place but has a real problem with the truth. Donald Trump is in first and the media, as well as Cruz, question whether or not he’s conservative.

Cruz rattles off donations Trump has made to liberals over the years including to Hillary Clinton and the gang of eight and Harry Reid. He also says that Trump has said he’s pro-abortion, and now after the Brussels bombing today says that Trump has said he wants to dismantle NATO.

Cruz is a conservative and if he was more than a first term Senator, I’d have no trouble voting for him over Trump. But his constant straining of the truth is a problem. Trump has said he’d like to scale back the US contribution in dollars to NATO and let the other countries involved add more to it so that the contributions are more equitable. That is NOT dismantling NATO.

Trump did make the contributions that Cruz said he did. But he made those as a businessman. Businessmen will contribute to parties to get access. Cruz has received money from Trump. Does that make Cruz a liberal too?

Then there’s Trump. Is he conservative? He has the right words at times as well as the ideas at times. On the other hand, when he says things it feels like he’s saying what he needs to say to get a vote but doesn’t really believe in what he says and other times, he sounds like a great advocate for Conservatives.

Ronald Reagan was a Democrat for years. He was even the President of the Screen Actors Guild for awhile. But he changed and turned out to be the standard bearer for conservatives. Has Trump done the same as Reagan?

When Cruz says that Trump is not the choice of 65% of the voters, I have to wonder how he’s the answer when he’s not the choice of 80% of the voters.

When Kasich says that Trump and Cruz advocate marching through towns and villages and gathering up illegal aliens and hauling them away leaving the children sitting on the front porch, he’s not being truthful. Nobody has come remotely close to suggesting that. Nobody is going to be storming homes looking for illegal aliens and they certainly aren’t going to leave children behind to fend for themselves. When mom and dad are deported, their kids will go with them. If the children are legal citizens by their birth, they will be able to return and unless Kasich is saying that the illegal aliens that are the parents are unfit, those children will be able to return legally when they are older an move away from home. But if the parents are unfit, those children would just go to another family member that is here legally.

The problem we have is that the border patrol has been ordered to stand down. They are not permitted to send back any illegal aliens. With Trump or Cruz, the border guards will be able to do their job.

Because Obama has given the stand down order, these refugees from Syria have a free ride to get in, but those others from the around the world come in through our southern border and how many  have terrorists embedded with them and they are coming here. None of them vetted. How many have slipped in and where are they now? The FBI has said they have ongoing investigations in all fifty states of possible terrorists already here. There have been over 1,500 deaths of American citizens by illegal aliens, including Robert Krentz and Arizona rancher on the border. How many Americans are going to have to die before the border laws are enforced?

I don’t know which of the candidates is going to be the better one to run against Hillary. I do know that I’m not taking Trumps word that Cruz is no good and I’m not taking Cruz’s word that Trump is no good. What I do know is that it doesn’t matter which one is the best. I will not be voting for Hillary nor any Democrat they choose to run when she’s indicted.
                     
The GOP threatening to contest the convention and throwing an establishment guy in there is going to rip apart the GOP and that will be the end for a very long time. It threatens to destroy this country. Cruz’s people won’t vote for Trump if he wins and Trumps people say they won’t vote for anyone but Trump. You cannot win elections without votes! If you don’t vote, you’re voting for Hillary.

The GOP has a monumental task over the next four years and over the next eight years. The border is a major problem. The economy is a major problem. The debt is a major problem. ISIS is a major problem and ought to be dealt with quickly.

There is also education that is a serious problem. We are raising a bunch of children that can’t think. They are taught now what to think rather than how to reason. This is best exemplified by the recent news that 10% of law school graduates think that Judge Judy is on the Supreme Court. Most of the kids don’t have any idea how our government is supposed to work and they can’t even tell you when this country got started.

With all of this gamesmanship, the GOP has taken a near certain election and just about handed it to Hillary. Grabbing defeat from the jaws of victory! 


One more aside....

The case for voting for whoever the Republican nominee is ......



If Trump is the Republican nominee, and if Hillary is the Democratic nominee, we have a real challenge. Most of us will admit that there are things we dislike about both of them; me too. However, if I go with the "lesser of the two evils", the choice is much easier; I hope the choice is easy for you too.
-----------------------------------------------------------

A lot of people have brought up the fact that they won't vote for Trump if he's the eventual nominee. I just want to put something in perspective.

Justice Scalia's seat is vacant. Ginsberg is 82 years old, Kennedy is 79, Breyer is 77, and Thomas is 67. Nowadays, the data shows that the average age of a Supreme Court retirement or death occurs after 75.

These are 5 vacancies that will likely come up over the next 4-8 years. The next President will have the power to potentially create a 7-2 Supreme Court skewed in their ideology.

Think about that... 7-2. If the next President appoints 5 young justices, it will guarantee control of the Supreme Court for an entire generation. 7-2 decisions will hold up much more over time than 5-4 decisions which are seemed to be lacking in mandate.

Hillary has made it clear she will use the Supreme Court to go after the 2nd Amendment.
She has literally said that the Supreme Court was wrong in its Heller decision stating that the Court should overturn and remove the individual right to keep and bear arms. Period.

Everyone saying that they won't vote for one candidate or the other if they are the GOP nominee, please realize this. If Hillary Clinton wins and gets to make these appointments, you likely will never see another Conservative victory at the Supreme Court level for the rest of your life. Ever. Now, this is scary!

If you are a Conservative, a vote for anyone but the GOP nominee, whomever that will be, is a vote for Hillary Clinton.





You’re welcome to comment.


Brett



Wednesday, March 9, 2016

GOP Establishment vs the Voter



The GOP seems to be alienating the Republican voters. It seems logical that when one party doesn’t perform, they lose seats or even their majority. In the first two years of the Clinton administration, the economy suffered, growing at an anemic 2.4% after having grown at 4.6% the final quarter of George H. W. Bush’s term. Clinton promised middle class tax cuts in the campaign of 1992 but after being elected, on a February night, in an address from the oval office, Clinton said that after some very hard work he just couldn’t provide the middle class tax cut.

Following the scandals (whitewater, travelgate and the death of Vince Foster) along with the attempted take over of the health care system with Hillarycare, the Republicans, under the leadership of Newt Gingrich put together the Contract With America and took over the House and Senate in 1994’s election.  

After continued spending and an attempt at immigration reform that failed due to Americans calling in to Washington to protest it, the Republicans lost their majority in the House in 2007. The collapse of the economy the following year, led to the election of Barack Obama for the presidency in 2008. He immediately pushed a stimulus package that did nothing but increase the unemployment rate above 10% (and begin the Tea Party) and sent the money for the stimulus to his friends in the Democrat party and their supporters, and the passage of Obamacare in the spring of 2010,the House returned to the Republicans in 2010.

In 2014, the Republicans also took over the Senate as Obamacare was beginning to kick in. Instead of defunding it, they funded it. They passed a budget to Obama’s liking, although not to the countries liking. To their credit, they did vote to repeal Obamacare, but it was vetoed by the President and they did not attempt to override his veto.

The Republicans were elected to the House and Senate to offset the onslaught of the President and the Democrats. Instead of following through on their promises, they walked nearly in lockstep with the President.

Now it’s 2016. The voters are fed up. They intend to take their country back. It’s very clear that the establishment Republicans were not interested in the voters. They were interested in their own positions. 17 Republicans decided to run for the Presidency. Three of them were “outsiders”. Carly Fiorina, who was arguably the best debater. Dr. Ben Carson, probably one of the mildest mannered and brilliant men of this country and Donald Trump, a successful, bombastic businessman with no humility about his accomplishments in business.

My own personal choice was Carly Fiorina. She was direct, forceful, extremely knowledgeable, not afraid to take it directly to Hillary, and excellent at debating and hopped right on the planned parenthood issue when the videos came out. Donald Trump joined the field last June. He hit the right issues in a loud and boisterous way. Illegal immigration, political correctness and his confidence in his ability to solve the trade deficit. He was also crude, rude and never timid.

The success of Fiorina, Trump and Carson led others to realize that the road to the White House was to be paved for the one that is an outsider. So Senator Marco Rubio and Senator Ted Cruz declared themselves outsiders.

Rubio looked and sounded good, but he has a problem. The gang of eight. He was a part and pushed for amnesty. Then it came out that as Speaker in Florida, he blocked legislation from coming up to rein in illegal immigration and pushed for lower tuition for illegal immigrants. Now he says he learned from it, and we need to secure the borders. Unfortunately, he adds the word “first” to it ,then continues on saying once we have secured the border and proven to the American people that we’re enforcing the law, he’s sure the Ameican people would be happy to engage in a conversation about the rest. The “rest” being amnesty. This is not an outsider. This is an establishment candidate. He ran as a tea party member to get the Senate seat, now he’s establishment. So I’m happy to see him failing and soon to be eliminated.

Cruz is probably the most conservative, but he’s also a first term Senator and not liked within the Senate. We’ve already had a first term senator as President. We’re replacing him in the fall. Given the choice between he and Trump, I guess I'd prefer Cruz. 

Now word comes out about a secret meeting in silicon valley by the establishment on how to thwart Trump. Their apparent selected choice to get behind is Marco Rubio. Some of those in attendance were, Apple CEO Tim Cook, Google co-founder Larry Page, Napster creator and Facebook investor Sean Parker, and Tesla Motors and SpaceX honcho Elon Musk all attended. So did Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), political guru Karl Rove, House Speaker Paul Ryan, GOP Sens. Tom Cotton (Ark.), Cory Gardner (Colo.), Tim Scott (S.C.), Rob Portman (Ohio) and Ben Sasse (Neb.), who recently made news by saying he "cannot support Donald Trump." 

Along with Ryan, the House was represented by Energy and Commerce Committee Chair Fred Upton (Mich.), Rep. Kevin Brady (Texas) and almost-Speaker Kevin McCarthy (Calif.), sources said, along with leadership figure Cathy McMorris Rodgers (Wash.), Budget Committee Chairman Tom Price (R-Ga.), Financial Services Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling (Texas) and Diane Black (Tenn.).
This is according to the Huffington Post and the Washington Post.

The establishment is getting a resounding denunciation from the voters across the country but they are trying to thwart the will of the voters by negating their choices to put their own up. For what? The good of the country or for the good of themselves? Did they learn nothing in 2014 when David Brat beat Eric Cantor, the leader of the Republicans in the House from Virginia?

We now have two leading candidates for President. Donald Trump and Ted Cruz. It’s appearing more and more as though Trump will win the nomination. But the establishment wants to put up Rubio or someone else rather than the two leading candidates that are being chosen repeatedly by the people. Any one of the 17 original candidates could have beaten Hillary Clinton in the fall. But these actions by the establishment and members of the press could very well hand the election to Hillary. If that happens, we may never get a chance again to be the country the founding fathers intended when they put together this country and created the constitution! If Hillary is beaten by the Republican, whomever he may be, the establishment ought to thank Bernie Sanders, a Socialist, because his victories are the only thing saving the Republicans from dealing with an onslaught from Hillary right now.

Under Hillary, the Supreme Court will be changed next January. Political correctness will be the law of the land. Illegal immigrants will pour across the border in even greater numbers creating a new voting block for Democrats that will never be corrected and terrorism will come full force to this country.

I have no idea if Trump will be a loose cannon as president, or if he will turn out to be another former Democrat, Ronald Reagan and actually accomplish much good for this country. But we DO know what happens if it’s President Hillary. Ash trays will again learn to fly. The White House will become a brothel and the country will be so far in debt in two years that we’ll never recover.

Mitt Romney, Megan McCain, and others that say they’ll not vote for Trump if he’s the nominee had better look past their own selfish desires and start considering the goo of country. Or hey, here’s an idea. Trust the people that actually elect who THEY want rather than dictate to them what they should do.

You’re welcome to comment.



Brett